Pharma Ethics
by Amelia Hoskins · Published · Updated
Compulsory Covert Bioenhancement
Compulsory moral bioenhancement discussed 2018 on pubmed National Library of Medicine
‘…it is morally preferable for compulsory moral bioenhancement to be administered without the recipients knowing they are receiving the enhancement’
How can deception ever be 'moral'?
‘…the covert administration of a compulsory moral bioenhancement program better conforms to public health ethics than does an overt compulsory program…a covert compulsory program promotes values such as liberty, utility, equality and autonomy better than an overt program does’
Does this mean everyone will be 'bioenhanced' without knowing about it, just to make things equal!?
Was that the goal with SARS-Cov-19 vaccinations and boosters?
Here it is explained that moral bioenhancement is actually to control unethical behaviours in mass groups.
It will identify similarities between the mechanisms that allow biological contagions (such as a virus) and behaviours (such as those concerned with ethical and unethical actions) to develop, spread, and be reinforced within a population. It will then go onto suggest that, just as with the epidemiological principle of herd immunity, if enough people underwent MBE to reach a minimum threshold then the incidence and spread of immoral behaviours could be significantly reduced, even in those who have not received MBE.
This sounds like a way to control people, not only to modify unwanted behaviour such as violence.
